Heroism in Ancient Rome and Modern
America
In
Disney’s The Incredibles, Mr.
Incredible turns from his car to see a young boy on a tricycle staring. “What
are you waiting for?” he asks, to which the boy responds, “I don’t
know…something amazing, I guess” (Bird, et. al.). Heroes in Western culture represent the
amazing and unattainable at every turn. They` lift buses and trains, they survive
explosions and burning buildings, and they lead entire nations to safety.
Though heroes have continually represented the good ideals for great men and
women in society, differing collective ideals and interests in cultures lead to
sometimes very different representations of the heroes of the time. Analyzing
the differences between heroes in different cultures can help us to understand
the values of those cultures.
In
the cultures of Ancient Rome and 21st Century America, Roman heroes
like Aeneas are patriotic and stoic in the face of moral dilemmas and lead
entire nations to safety through their courage and exceptional feats. In
contrast, modern American heroes like Batman and Iron Man, though still
fighting for the public good, do not always choose the good of the many when
faced with moral dilemmas, and they often fight for the public good as renegade
vigilantes instead of as public figures. These differences in each culture’s
heroes reveal a Roman focus on prioritization of the good of the many and trust
in public leadership while they reveal a modern American focus on individualism
and distrust of political power and authority.
One
defining characteristic of Roman heroes is their prioritization of their
nation’s welfare above all else. In Vergil’s Aeneid, Rome’s foremost example of a hero, Aeneas, confronts a
moral dilemma during his time in Carthage in that he and Carthage’s Dido fall
in love. Dido falls in love to the point where she considers the relationship
nearly a marriage, and Aeneas likewise feels some level of commitment to Dido.
Nevertheless, when Jupiter tells Aeneas in a dream that he must leave Carthage
to make the then Trojans great in their destined new home of Italy, Aeneas does
not hesitate in breaking off his relationship with Dido for the good of the
Romans, saying, “If the Fates would allow me to lead my own life/ And to order
my priorities as I see fit,/ The welfare of Troy would be my first concern, . .
.” (Vergil 4.388-390). Even when presented with the choice between his love for Dido and his love for
his country, Aeneas chooses his country. The heroic story of Horatius Cocles
likewise gives an example of a Roman man that became a hero through his
sacrificing himself to save his country. To save the Roman army, he “shouted to
them to break down the bridge by sword or fire, or by whatever means they
could, he would meet the enemies' attack so far as one man could keep them at
bay” (Livy). Cocles sacrifices himself willingly even when he knows he will die
for the good of his people. Both heroes point to the Roman ideal of
prioritizing the nation above the self.
(Spoiler Alert: Skip this paragraph if you have not
seen the end of The Dark Knight)
In
contrast, heroes in 21st Century America often have internal
conflicts where their society’s welfare is not necessarily their highest
priority. In the example of Christopher Nolan’s The Dark Knight, the hero of the movie, Batman, is presented with a
choice toward the end of the movie of either saving a woman he loves or one of
the only good political leaders in the city. Batman saves the political leader,
but the audience receives a surprise when Batman reveals later that he had been
tricked and that he had intended to save the woman and not the political
leader. Batman’s prioritization of his personal relationship over the leader is
a major difference from Roman ideals. Other modern heroes like Iron Man and Ant-Man
also downplay the importance of societal welfare by focusing on the internal
conflict for the heroes between pursuing the societal welfare and their own
personal goals of wealth and fame. Though ultimately many modern heroes do
choose the good of society, they struggle to make that choice and often choose
to pursue their own personal goal first.
A
second defining characteristic of Roman heroes is their leadership ability. In
the Aeneid, Aeneas leads the entire
remainder of the Trojan nation from country to country seeking a new home. Each
time Aeneas makes a decision, his people follow him into journeys and battles
and any other endeavor he decides to pursue. He describes himself as “Aeneas,
duty-bound, and known/ Above high air of heaven by my fame,/ Carrying with me
in my ships our gods/ Of hearth and home, saved from the enemy” (Vergil 1.519-522).
He is never questioned by his subordinates, and he conquers whole nations with
his own at his side. For example, when Aeneas fights against the Latins at the
end of the Aeneid, his people fight
together against the Latin nation, and only the idle and weak fall behind and
are beaten by Turnus. Aeneas gives speeches as well that persuade and convince
his people to follow him and fight well. As Vergil writes of Aeneas and his
descendents in the Aeneid, “Your
mission, Roman, is to rule the world./ These will be your arts: to establish
peace,/ To spare the humbled, and to conquer the proud” (6.1016-1018). The
focus on Aeneas’ political clout and his authority as a leader of the Trojans in
the Aeneid points to another Roman
ideal of having a nation led by the most influential and powerful with the
others following without question.
Though
Roman heroes are defined by their power as public figures, American heroes act
more as renegade vigilantes fighting for the good of society from the shadows.
Heroes like Batman, Spider-Man, and Ant-Man remain anonymous to keep their
personal lives safe. “Your friendly neighborhood Spider-Man” portrays himself
as the local enforcer of good behavior where no one else is able with his
uncle’s advice, “With great power comes great responsibility” (Ziskin). In contrast with
Roman heroes, Spider-Man works alone to keep social peace in the large New York
City with its many criminals lurking in the shadows. Bat-Man even more
explicitly acts as a peacekeeper where society has failed in his fictional
Gotham city as "a silent guardian, a watchful protector, the dark knight.” These
heroes act as individuals to protect the general welfare where the governments
of their societies have failed. Even modern American superheroes like Super-Man
and Captain America that do have political power in their societies are put at
odds with their governments because of corruption or other factors that create
a conflict between what is considered legal and what is considered right or
good. This focus on each individuals’ pursuit of goodness reveals American
distrust in authority and a focus on individual responsibility.
Analyzing the differences between heroes like Aeneas and Horatius Cocles in Roman culture and ones like Spider-Man, Bat-Man, and Iron Man in modern American culture point to the prioritization of political solidarity and a prioritization of the public good in Roman culture and to a focus on individual responsibility and distrust in authority in modern American culture.Both Roman and 21st Century American cultures use heroes as examples of the good and the admirable from the perspective of each society. The differences between the heroes in each society help us to understand the larger picture of what was and is important in the different society. These differences fit with the political and social contexts of their respective societies as Roman society was a highly controlled society especially under Augustus while American culture is relatively free and individualistic. In both cases, though, we can see that heroes clearly play an important role in communicating values.
Works Cited
Bird,
Brad, Craig T. Nelson, Holly Hunter, Samuel L. Jackson, Jason Lee, Spencer Fox,
Andrew Jimenez, Patrick Lin, Janet Lucroy, and Michael Giacchino. The
Incredibles. United States: Walt Disney Home Entertainment, 2005.
Livy. Titus Livy, History of Rome from its Foundation
(D. Spillane trans., 1906-1908).
Metaphysics, by
Aristotle and Laura Maria Castelli, Clarendon Press, 2018.
Nolan, Christopher, Charles Roven, Emma Thomas,
David S. Goyer, Jonathan Nolan, Christian Bale, Heath Ledger, Aaron Eckhart,
Michael Caine, Maggie Gyllenhaal, Gary Oldman, Morgan Freeman, James N. Howard,
Hans Zimmer, and Bob Kane. The Dark Knight. Burbank, CA: Warner
Home Video, 2008.
The Essential Aeneid, by Virgil and Stanley Lombardo, Hackett Pub. Co., 2006, p. 131.
Ziskin, Laura, Ian Bryce, David Koepp, Sam
Raimi, Tobey Maguire, Willem Dafoe, Kirsten Dunst, James Franco, Cliff
Robertson, Rosemary Harris, J K. Simmons, Don Burgess, Bob Murawski, Arthur
Coburn, Danny Elfman, James Acheson, Neil Spisak, John Dykstra, Stan Lee, and
Steve Ditko. Spider-man. , 2002.
I really enjoyed your paper! Your opening paragraph was great and had me interested from the very first line. I especially liked how you took a wider perspective and talked a bit more about what the differences reveal about the societies as a whole. One thing that I had not previously thought of was how the clash between modern heroes and government shows the distrust that we have for authority. That is definitely a good point and an interesting take away.
ReplyDeleteColby, I like how you discussed American heroes’ distrust in authority and how that is caused by the freedom and individualism we have today. Very interesting point! However, I do believe the internal conflict you mentioned about American heroes exclusively is also present in Roman heroes and in everyone. Overall, this was a very thought-provoking paper! Nice work!
ReplyDeleteYou started off with "The Incredibles" which already means you must have written a great paper....
ReplyDeleteBut other than that, I saw one line in particular that stood out to me,
"Though Roman heroes are defined by their power as public figures, American heroes act more as renegade vigilantes fighting for the good of society from the shadows."
I think that was a very incisive remark and you hit the nail on the head. We love heroes now a days that do their job without recognition and without fame. In the times of Rome, that seemed to be the purpose of heroic actions. Great comment and essay.
Your argument about modern heroes fighting from the shadows and ancient Roman heroes being seen and openly celebrated by all was very interesting and so true. I had not thought about that part of modern heroes. Going along with that, I liked the part about modern heroes fighting solo, not trusting authority to be able to help them accomplish their mission and how ancient heroes were much more publicly involved.
ReplyDelete